AP, DOJ clash over seriousness of leak that prompted phone records seizure
Jonathan Ernst / Reuters
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder calls on a reporter during a news conference at the Justice Department on Tuesday.
National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News
Justice Department and Associated Press officials clashed Tuesday over leaked classified information that led the government to seize AP phone records, with Attorney General Eric Holder saying it “put the American people at risk” and the news organization’s chief executive insisting it delayed publishing its story until it was assured “national security concerns had passed.”
The day of back-and-forth public sallies came as new details emerged about negotiations between the AP and U.S. officials over the unauthorized release of classified information on a foiled bomb plot in Yemen, information that apparently triggered the investigation.
“This was a very, very serious leak,” Holder said at a news conference. “I’ve been a prosecutor since 1976 – and I have to say that this is among, if not the most serious, in the top two or three most serious leaks that I’ve ever seen. It put the American people at risk – and that is not hyperbole.”
Holder defended the secret subpoena for about two months of AP phone records on 20 separate telephone lines without prior notice as a necessary step, saying that trying to find the source of the leak “required very aggressive action.”
Holder’s comments and a letter from Deputy Attorney General James Cole defending the seizure of the AP records – without notifying the news organization until last week – drew a stern response from AP President and CEO Gary Pruitt. He blasted the action as “overbroad under the law,” saying that “more than 100 journalists work in the locations served by those telephones.”
“Rather than talk to us in advance, they seized these phone records in secret, saying that notifying us would compromise their investigation,” Pruitt said in a statement late Tuesday. “They offer no explanation of this, however.
***********************************************************************************************
DOJ’s secret subpoena of AP phone records broader than initially revealed
Information has emerged in the Justice Department seizure of Associated Press phone records as well as the news that reporter for Fox News is now a target of a leak investigation concerning North Korea. NBC’s Michael Isikoff reports.
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena for AP phone records included the seizure of records for five reporters’ cellphones and three home phones as well as two fax lines, a lawyer for the news organization tells NBC News.
David Schulz, the chief lawyer for the AP, said the subpoenas also covered the records for 21 phone lines in five AP office lines — including one for a dead phone line at office in Washington that had been shut down six years ago. The phone lines at four other offices – where 100 reporters worked — were also covered by the subpoenas, Schulz said.
Although AP had given general information about the subpoenas last week, it provided new details Monday about the number of cell and home phone records as it considers possible legal action against the Justice Department.
Related articles
- DOJ’s secret subpoena of AP phone records broader than initially revealed (openchannel.nbcnews.com)
- AP Chief: Sources No Longer Willing To Talk To Press Due To DOJ Phone Records Seizure (patdollard.com)
- AP CEO calls records seizure unconstitutional (newsobserver.com)
- AP Says Government Seizure Was Unconstitutional And Has Terrified Sources (news.firedoglake.com)
- DOJ subpoenas are ‘unconstitutional,’ hurt press, AP president says (foxnews.com)
- DOJ’s secret subpoena of AP phone records broader than initially revealed (oddonion.com)
- DOJ seizure of AP records broader than first revealed (openchannel.nbcnews.com)
- ‘Unconstitutional’: AP CEO Blasts ‘Abusive’ Justice Dept. in First TV Interview Since Scandal Broke (theblaze.com)
- Eric Holder: The Culture of Corruption Enforcer (frontpagemag.com)
- AP CEO calls records seizure unconstitutional (sfgate.com)




U.S. Attorney James Santelle, who argued that warrantless surveillance cameras on private property “does not violate the Fourth Amendment.”
Crime-fighting authorities in the United States can snoop upon your email activity, who you are instant messaging, and what you are up to on Facebook, Google Plus and other social networks in real-time, not only without your permission – but without even requiring a warrant.
To initiate pen register or trap and trace surveillance under the act, therefore, law enforcement can simply request approval from a judge by saying that the information they are likely to obtain is “relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation”.



