Tag Archive: Second Amendment to the United States Constitution


Missouri Legislature Nullifies All Federal Gun Control Measures by a Veto-Proof Majority

Filed under: Activism, bureaucracy, Conspiracy Theories, Freedom, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, Guns, Indoctrination, Lack Of Transparency, Legislation, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Power Struggle, Rule Of Law, Secrecy, Self_Defense / Crime Prevention / Security, Special Interests, State Sovereignty, The American Constitution — Leave a comment
May 9, 2013

Posted by

Jefferson City, Mo (May 8, 2013) – Tonight, the Missouri State House voted to send Governor Jay Nixon what could arguably be the strongest defense against federal gun control measures in American history.  The vote was 116-38.

HB436, introduced by Representative Doug Funderburk in February, was initially passed by the House in April by a vote of 115-42.  Last week, the State Senate approved the bill with an amendment which did not change any of its nullification aspects. The vote there was 26-6.  The bill then needed one final vote in the house which happened just before 10pm local time this evening.

The votes in both the House and Senate are by a strong veto-proof majority.  Local activist Matt Radcliffe acknowledged as much when he said, “Governor Nixon can do nothing and it will automatically become law July 1st.  Or he can sign it into law. Or he can veto it then his veto will be overridden in the house and it will become law anyway!”

As law, HB436 would nullify virtually every federal gun control measure on the books – or planned for the future.   It reads, in part:

All federal acts, laws, orders, rules, and regulations, whether past, present, or future, which infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, shall be specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state.

(2) Such federal acts, laws, orders, rules, and regulations include, but are not limited to:
(a) The provisions of the federal Gun Control Act of 1934;
(b) The provisions of the federal Gun Control Act of 1968;
(c) Any tax, levy, fee, or stamp imposed on firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition not common to all other goods and services which could have a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;
(d) Any registering or tracking of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition which could have a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;
(e) Any registering or tracking of the owners of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition which could have a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;
(f) Any act forbidding the possession, ownership, or use or transfer of any type of firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition by law-abiding citizens; and
(g) Any act ordering the confiscation of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition from law-abiding citizens.

The legislation also includes misdemeanor criminal penalties if agents of the federal government attempt to enact gun control measures that violate the Constitution of the United States and State Constitution of Missouri.

The immediate effect of the law would be as follows:

1.  All state and local law enforcement would be required to stop enforcing, or even providing any assistance in enforcing, federal gun control measures – all of them.

2.  Grassroots activists should immediately start pressing local governments – county, city and town – to pass an ordinance which a) states an unwavering dedication to the new law passed, and b) requires all local law enforcement and all government assets to immediately cease in the enforcement of federal gun control measures.

Read Full Article Here
Related articles
About these ads
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

Texas Action Alert: 2nd Gun Control Nullification Bill Hits the House Floor on Saturday

Filed under: Fundamental Rights, Freedom, The American Constitution, Legislation, Rule Of Law, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, State Sovereignty — 2 Comments
May 4, 2013
**************************************************************************************************

Posted by

Joining HB1076 for a full Texas State House vote on SATURDAY, May 4th, is HB928. Both are based on the same principle – that no one working for government in the state of Texas will enforce federal gun control measures. 1076 focuses only on new federal gun control enacted on or after January 1, 2013. But HB928 makes no distinction – and virtually all federal gun control measures will be unenforceable within the state of Texas.

This would make a HUGE dent in any new federal effort to further restrict the right to keep and bear arms in Texas.As Judge Andrew Napolitano has said recently, such widespread noncompliance can make a federal law “nearly impossible to enforce” (video here). And in those limited situations where enforcement does occur, Rosa Parks has taught us all the power of “NO!”  Passage of HB928 would mark the beginning of the end of federal gun control measures in Texas.  HB928 also provides for a mechanism to ensure that local governments don’t decide to start helping out the Feds – state grant monies would be withdrawn from those localities that assist federal gun control.

Quite simply, the federal government absolutely cannot enforce gun control in Texas without the help of Texas.

YOUR PHONE CALLS ARE NEEDED NOW TO SUPPORT THIS BILL

Since the vote is on Saturday, make a CALL – emails won’t have impact. Call after business hours if you have to – and leave a message. Any and every phone call will help move this bill forward.

1. Call your STATE Representative and ask them to vote YES on HB928

FIND YOUR REP:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/find-your-representative/

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

Maddow Blog article, “Pointless Nullification in Kansas.”…. Apparently MSM hasn’t a clue as to what State Sovereignty means.

Filed under: bureaucracy, Complacency / Apathy, Conspiracy Theories, Corruption, Freedom, Freedom of Information, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, Hypocrisy, Indoctrination, Lack Of Transparency, Legislation, Main Stream Media Manipulations/Lies, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Power Struggle, Secrecy, Security, Special Interests, State Sovereignty, The American Constitution, Unethical — Leave a comment
April 27, 2013

MSNBC: Where it’s Always Opposite Day

Posted by

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 10:53 — 10.0MB)

86241I get it.  I really do.  But that doesn’t mean I’m going to ignore it.

It seems obvious to me that in order to hold a place of prominence at MSNBC you either need to be a partisan hack, or totally clueless of history.

Probably both.

So when MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show producer Steve Benen shares his opinion, it’s usually just best to turn a blind eye to his idiocy.

But, sometimes it’s important to pay attention to what they say because it can actually give us insight on just what we should do for liberty.  In fact, if you believe in the right to keep and bear arms and wonder what to do to support that right, you’ll get all the advice you need in Steve’s recent Maddow Blog article, “Pointless Nullification in Kansas.”

Surprised?  Read on.  It’s true.

BACKSTORY 

This month, Kansas Governor Sam Brownback signed into law the “Second Amendment Protection Act,” a bill that reasserts the state’s role in protecting the right to keep and bear arms of those living there.   The bill reads, in part:

“Any act, law, treaty, order, rule or regulation of the government of the United States which violates the second amendment to the constitution of the United States is null, void and unenforceable in the state of Kansas.”

In conjunction with the above clause, the bill defines what is meant by “the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States,” and that it isn’t based off a decision by the Supreme Court.

The second amendment to the constitution of the United States reserves to the people, individually, the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Kansas was admitted to statehood in 1861, and the guaranty of that right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Kansas and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Kansas in 1859 and the United States in 1861.

By definition, state and local agents cannot enforce any acts or actions that are “null, void and unenforceable in the state of Kansas.”  Based off this text, the state of Kansas now cannot participate in any federal gun control measures that restrict the individual right to keep and bear arms as understood when Kansas became a state in 1861.

I happen to think such a state law is a big deal.   In Steve’s blog “report” on the issue, he quoted me as saying that this bill is “potentially the most important state level bill passed in modern American history.”

He didn’t take too kindly to that opinion, though, and spent some time talking about my “hyperbole” and the “cause for alarm” over the fact that Brownback signed this bill into law.

In fact, Steve spent quite a bit of time explaining how such an act is a waste of time.  He even said the law doesn’t make “any sense at all.”

SENSE 

So here’s some sense for our propagandist.  According to Steve, the courts, and the court only, determine what the constitution actually means.  But that flies in the face of what James Madison had to say.  You know Madison, the guy referred to as the “Father of the Constitution.”   In his own words:

“The States then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and consequently that as the parties to it, they must themselves decide in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.”

 

Read Full Article Here

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

Larry Pratt Schools Gun Control Cheerleaders

Filed under: bureaucracy, Conspiracy Theories, Freedom, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, Hypocrisy, Irrational Fear, Lack Of Transparency, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Power Struggle, Psy - Ops, Rule Of Law, Secrecy, Self_Defense / Crime Prevention / Security, Special Interests, The American Constitution, Unethical, Weaponry / Armament — 2 Comments
April 7, 2013

Filibuster gains support to delay gun control vote

By David Sherfinski

-

The Washington Times

Sunday, April 7, 2013

A growing number of senators are trying to quash gun legislation before it even hits the chamber floor as Democrats hold out hope for a compromise and the White House gears up for a weeklong offensive to pressure Congress to act.

Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said as many as 13 senators now publicly support a filibuster on the motion to proceed on pending gun legislation, which effectively would block debate on the bill.

“When you’re in a snake pit, you kill a snake any time and chance that you get,” Mr. Pratt said on C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” that aired Sunday. “When you’re dealing with legislation, you take your best shot as soon as you can.”

Republican Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Mike Lee of Utah and Ted Cruz of Texas wrote a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid last week saying they intend to delay Mr. Reid’s efforts to move a legislative package that currently includes measures to require background checks on all gun sales. Politico also reported that another letter with Monday’s date now has 13 signatures on it.

Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, said Sunday that whether he can support requiring background checks at gun shows depends on precisely how they’re carried out — but that there should be a debate on the issue.

“What are we afraid of?” Mr. McCain said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “Everybody wants the same goal, and that is to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals and people who are mentally disabled.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, also has said he would not support a filibuster.

Federally licensed firearms dealers are required to conduct background checks on gun purchasers, but the so-called “gun show loophole” exempts private sellers from the requirement.

Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat, would need 60 votes to shut down a filibuster.

Read Full Article Here

***********************************************************************************************************************

Larry Pratt Executive Director, GOA

Written by Administrator

Larry Pratt has been Executive Director of Gun Owners of America for over 30 years. GOA is a national membership organization of 300,000 Americans dedicated to promoting their Second Amendment freedom to keep and bear arms.

GOA lobbies for the pro-gun position in Washington, D.C. and is involved in firearm issues in the states. GOA’s work includes providing legal assistance to those involved in lawsuits with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, the federal firearms law enforcement agency.

Pratt has appeared on numerous national radio and TV programs such as NBC’s Today Show, CBS’ Good Morning America, CNN’s Crossfire and Larry King Live, Fox’s Hannity and Colmes and many others. He has debated Congressman James Traficant, Jr. (D-OH), Charles Rangel (D-NY), Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY), Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), and Vice President Al Gore, among others. His columns have appeared in newspapers across the country.

He published a book, Armed People Victorious, in 1990 and was editor of a book, Safeguarding Liberty: The Constitution & Militias, 1995. His latest book, On the Firing Line: Essays in the Defense of Liberty was published in 2001.

Pratt has held elective office in the state legislature of Virginia, serving in the House of Delegates. Pratt directs a number of other public interest organizations and serves as the Vice-Chairman of the American Institute for Cancer Research.

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

Sheriffs Prepare to Abandon Citizens to Federal Gun Grab

Filed under: Freedom, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, Hypocrisy, Legislation, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Power Struggle, Rule Of Law, Security, Special Interests, State Sovereignty, The American Constitution, Weaponry / Armament — 1 Comment
February 15, 2013

image source

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post

In the wake of the highly questionable surge in school shootings and the long-awaited gun grabbing effort being promoted by the President, lawmakers, and the mainstream media, hundreds of American sheriffs have now gone on the record to state publicly that they will not enforce any new gun laws such as the ones being proposed in the halls of the U.S. Congress.

While the fact that such grassroots political pressure exists in an amount that would warrant such statement by sheriffs all across the country, the fact also remains that many of these public officials are merely cashing in on an exploitable situation to score political approval from their constituents – political approval for a stance they never intend to honor. This much is apparent to anyone who is even a casual observer of political discourse or the development of the overarching agenda inside the United States and elsewhere in the world.My case in point is Kershaw County Sheriff Jim Matthews.

Sheriff Matthews has been the subject of my articles several times in the past; once after he declared an activist to be a “domestic extremist” after the individual had merely “liked” an article on Facebook and then again after Matthews developed a program of round-the-clock checkpoints in Kershaw County, South Carolina.Matthews’ conversion of Kershaw County into a virtual police state, as well as his continued attack on all things free, should thus have raised the suspicions as to the sincerity of many of the sheriffs who had attached their names to the “Will Not Enforce” list regarding the latest attempts at eliminating the Second Amendment.

Yet, considering the positions and statements made by so many other sheriffs, Matthews own position was much more tepid when it came to actually defending Constitutional rights, a task which is clearly not the strong suit of his department and administration.

Indeed, Matthews’ position was that he was not “going to take your guns,” is an eerily similar claim which was also made by Barack Obama.

Matthews stated, “I’m not going to get rid of mine. I don’t have a problem with assault weapon owners who follow the law. My problem is with thugs who should be in jail who get their hands on guns.”

Of course, at issue is the fact that if new gun laws are passed banning assault weapons, assault weapons owners will no longer be following the law. This is why Matthews and other sheriffs were asked the question as to whether or not they would enforce such laws to begin with.

Matthews went on to ask South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson for his opinion on the coming Federal gun grab. Essentially, Matthews requested AG Wilson to explain to him his responsibility as Sheriff when faced with an unconstitutional law.

Still, Matthews stated that he does not believe sheriffs can stop federal agents from enforcing these laws in his jurisdiction.

“A lot of sheriffs want to be able to fall back on what the AG says on what we lawfully have to do or don’t have to do,” Matthews said.

That opinion has finally arrived. Unfortunately, it confirms the weakness of state governments as well as the complete disregard for Constitutional, civil, and human rights at the federal, state, and local levels.

According to Attorney General Wilson, if federal law enforcement officers attempt to enforce unconstitutional gun laws or even confiscate existing weapons, then neither state law nor state law enforcement officials can stand in the way. Going further, Wilson suggests that, if state or local law enforcement officials do attempt to impede federal assaults on the rights of South Carolinians, these state law enforcement officials would themselves be subject to criminal prosecution.

Yet Wilson’s opinion goes even further than stating that state and local law enforcement are unable to actually protect the rights of their citizens from federal assaults, it claims that federal agents are granted a type of immunity from state prosecution even if they are clearly violating Constitutional rights.

The opinion states that “federal agents are immune from state prosecution even when their conduct violated internal agency regulations or exceeded their express authority.”

This is quite a concerning statement to say the least. As the Kershaw County Patriots (KCP) wrote in the article, “SC Attorney General: Come Get The Guns!”

This means that an agent could come to your home, break into your home, ransack the place, seize anything, all without a warrant and he would be immune from state prosecution or even interference with his ransacking.

Read Full Article Here

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

Gun Control : The Debate That Will Not Go Quietly Into The Night

Filed under: Activism, bureaucracy, Coexistence, Community, Crossroads News : Changes In The World Around Us And Our Place In It, Fraud, Freedom, Freedom of Information, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, History, Hypocrisy, Indoctrination, Irrational Fear, Lack Of Transparency, Legislation, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Secrecy, Security, Self_Defense / Crime Prevention / Security, Special Interests, State Sovereignty, The American Constitution, Weaponry / Armament — 1 Comment
February 5, 2013

New York State Resistance – “… prime for something like that.” 1/29/13

Published on Feb 1, 2013

With no soundtrack – Complete 33 minute video is here – Non-Compliance Resistance Evident at Buffalo vs New York State Q & A Forum on the Arms Bill – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol1SzjHPFGw

Non-Compliance Resistance Evident at Buffalo vs New York State Q & A Forum on the Arms Bill

Published on Jan 30, 2013

January 29, 2013

Residents of Erie County, New York overflow the
State’s dictating / Q & A forum concerning the
unconstitutional NY Safe Act arms bill.

The passion and anger from the people is evident
of Erie County resistance.

After the first speaker spoke, the second one was
introduced. A request from an audience member to
recite the Pledge of Allegiance was ignored by the
State. So the people took over and assertively
recited it anyway.

The State attempted to have private interviews with
the media which alienated the crowd further, who
then demanded transparency. Then the State wanted
the questions from the audience to be private, which
riled folks even more.

Questions asked by Western New Yorkers covered:
non-compliance, penalties, jury nullification, 2nd
Amendment profiling into domestic terrorists,
government tyranny, police, sheriff, and more.

Other topics, and especially on the people forming
militias was missed due to full camera memory.

Welcome to blue collar Buffalo.

* * *

Clarence, NY (WKBW) -

A question and answer session on New York’s new gun law turned testy, as gun owners unleash a fury of anger on the new legislation.

Frustration boiled over for people who feel as though they are law abiding citizens, being turned into criminals.

For many, it was a chance to vent anger at Albany.

One WNYer even said “You put a brown shirt on Mr. Cuomo and put him on
television, he would look just like Hitler.”

Another chimed in, “Angry people get together, they form militias
folks. This country, this WNY is prime for something like that!”

Western New York gun owners say they SAFE Act and its ban on assault weapons makes no sense.

One of the big concerns — who is footing the bill for making changes to guns that are now considered assault weapons. State officials told the crowd the gun owners are the ones responsible.

People in the crowd also had a lot of questions about the registration laws. One gun owner asked,”What is the penalty if you don’t register it? ‘Cause I guarantee there’s a lot of people that aren’t going to.”

At times, advocates felt answers were incomplete or political.

http://www.wkbw.com/news/local/Firey-Meeting-About-NY-SAFE-Act-18892719

Anonymous — Response To Obama’s 2013 Gun Control Policy

Published on Jan 11, 2013

Please share this video with your family, friends, and co-workers. Most of all, share with people who are anti-gun.
Please explain to them that losing the 2nd Amendment is not just about guns, but that it will open the door to the future restrictions of the Rights of ALL Americans.
Tell them to imagine what it would be like to lose the Right to Free Speech, or the Freedom of Religion. Explain to them that history has proven many many times that once a government starts restricting the Rights of their people, it quickly becomes easier to do so, and impossible to stop once it has started. Show them unbiased research.

Also explain to them that by restricting Law Abiding citizens from owning firearms, their safety will be placed further into jeopardy by even bolder criminal acts. Let them know that even though they themselves may not choose to own or carry a firearm, by the fact that other law abiding people do choose to arm themselves, it does actually make them safer. Criminals who commit their crimes now, do so with the full knowledge that there is a strong possibility they will run into a gun owner. And criminals choose their victims based on this knowledge. They try to choose victims who are unlikely be armed. But once criminals know the public is disarmed, they will be able to commit even more violent crimes with NO FEAR that a victim might have the ability to fight back.

Mirrored Under Fair Use. Please feel free to download and upload this video to your channel. Copy and Paste description text with video if you wish.

I do not own the copyrights to this or the contents of this video. Author has given fair use permission to copy and share, and is so stated in the video.
Description text is original work of Dave Gunslinger. As text author, I give fair use permission. DG All monetary rights have been removed.

Even to Arms: Sheriffs Refuse Gun Laws!

Published on Jan 31, 2013

Calling ALL local, county, and state law enforcement organizations: please take note of the statement issued by the Utah Sheriffs’ Association (USA) on Jan 17, 2013 in refusing to enforce unconstitutional laws such as the AWB and its provisions. They are setting the standard for you to follow and we recommend you do so immediately. The proposed banning, registration, fingerprinting, taxing, road blocks, and no doubt coming felony arrests for non-compliance fly directly in the face of the 2nd Amendment. These freedom destructing laws are done on a LIE of so-called increased “public safety.” Wise Sheriff Associations such as UT, FL, GA, CO, NB, and NM have seen through this deception and see the omninous, real reasons: incremental but full civilian disarmament whereby the full Progressive agenda can and will be implemented. Get read to be impressed by these officers and AGENCIES who are standing by their oaths taken, even unto force of arms. We their good citizens will stand beside them (see vid) and give them our humble support. This TNP Call to Action will have you write USA (and YOUR Sheriff Agencies and Associations) in support of their constitutional and RULE OF LAW commitments. Likewise you need to write those agencies not on board with PROTECTING YOU. A good example of this would be SLC Sheriff Jim Winder whose statement in opposition is shocking (read). These agencies are pledging to enforce whatever laws come their way from socialist President Obama and whatever he sees fit to do with you. They seem unconcerned/unwilling/afraid to make a judgment call on these flagrant violations of our natural rights and say it is up to the Obama’s courts to decide. This is a critical and supremely important states rights issue that will gain serious momentum and you need to take a stand; make your voice heard. If the Federal govt presses the issue, you may see these agencies under the Constitutional Rule of Law rise up in arms to defend you against tyranny. They may need you too. You will see this list of agencies grow as the feel and hear from millions of GOOD, reasonable, and rational Americans the ask LE agencies to step up to the plate and do exactly what we elected them to do. In TNP we are unified, dedicated force defending freedom, defending good. Join us.///////////////////////Contact Utah Sheriff’s Association, Jim Robertson, at FAX 435-888-0842, Voice 435-888-2004, Address: 787 E Carbon, UT, 84520//////////////Also please search out the addresses and contact GA, FL, NM, CO Sheriff Associations (more coming too!) and send them the same letter, especially if constituent/////////////////Please support http://www.oathkeepers.org and http://www.cspoa.org. Link to updated Sheriff Associations/Agencies refusing enforcement of AWB: http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights///////////////////Stupid TNP Freedom Merchandise like hats, shell casings, engraved items at: http://www.nutnfancy.bigcartel.com//////////////////////////LINKS TO PDF LETTER FILES (you can cut and paste from them too!): TO SHERIFF WHO LIKES AWB (WINDER): http://www.scribd.com/doc/123254372/Sheriff-Winder-Reconsider-Letter TO SHERIFF WHO OPPOSES AWB: http://www.scribd.com/doc/123254373/TNP-Nutnfancy-Sheriff-Support-Letter/////… Sheriff Reach on 13 March 2013: http://www.facebook.com/events/491098824266882/

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

The Resistance Begins: New York Gun Owners Refuse to Register; “Largest Act of Civil Disobedience in State History”

Filed under: Activism, bureaucracy, Conspiracy Theories, Corruption, crime, Excessive Use Of Force, Fraud, Freedom, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, Harassment, History, Immigration, Irrational Violence, Legislation, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Power Struggle, Provocation / Incitement, Rule Of Law, Security, Signs Of The Times, Special Interests, The American Constitution, Weaponry / Armament — 2 Comments
January 26, 2013

Mac Slavo
January 25th, 2013
SHTFplan.comResistance Begins

With emotions running high in the aftermath of the Newtown Sandy Hook shooting, politicians on the State and Federal level have begun introducing legislative actions to curtail access to firearms protected by the Second Amendment. In Missouri, parents may soon be forced to register firearms with their child’s school under threat of criminal penalties. In Massachusetts, another proposal would require storage of semi-automatic rifles at government approved storage depots. And, in the State of New York, congressional representatives have already passed legislation that requires registration of every semi-automatic rifle and reduces maximum magazine capacity to 7 rounds of ammunition, and Governor Cuomo has floated the idea of gun confiscation.

Now, in what is sure to be a growing trend across the entire country, New York gun owners are organizing a resistance against what many believe to be the most, “brazen infringement on the right to keep and bear arms anywhere in the nation,” according to The New American:

Preparations are already being made for mass resistance.

“I’ve heard from hundreds of people that they’re prepared to defy the law, and that number will be magnified by the thousands, by the tens of thousands, when the registration deadline comes,’’ said President Brian Olesen with American Shooters Supply, among the biggest gun dealers in the state, in an interview with the New York Post.

Even government officials admit that forcing New Yorkers to register their guns will be a tough sell, and they are apparently aware that massive non-compliance will be the order of the day. “Many of these assault-rifle owners aren’t going to register; we realize that,’’ a source in the Cuomo administration told the Post, adding that officials expect “widespread violations” of the new statute.

Threats of imprisoning gun owners for up to a year and confiscating their weapons are already being issued by governor’s office, headed by a rabid anti-Second Amendment extremist who suggested before the bill passed that “confiscation” of all semi-automatic rifles was being considered. If tens or even hundreds of thousands of otherwise law-abiding citizens refuse to comply, however, analysts say New York would either have to start raising taxes and building a lot more prisons, or give up on the scheme that experts say will do nothing to reduce violence and that lawmakers say is aimed at eventual confiscation.

Activists involved in the state-wide boycott against the unconstitutional statute who spoke to the Post almost taunted authorities, saying gun owners would essentially dare authorities to “come and take it away.”

According to the paper, leaders of some of the state’s hundreds of gun clubs, dealers, and non-profit organizations, citing the New York Constitution’s guarantee that gun rights “cannot be infringed,” are currently involved in organizing the resistance. Among the primary concerns is that, with registration, authorities would know where to go for confiscation, an idea already proposed openly by Governor Cuomo himself.

“They’re saying, ‘F— the governor! F— Cuomo! We’re not going to register our guns,’ and I think they’re serious. People are not going to do it. People are going to resist,” explained State Rifle and Pistol Association President Tom King, who also serves on the National Rifle Association board of directors. “They’re taking one of our guaranteed civil rights, and they’re taking it away.”

Opponents of the right to bear arms, take heed. The American people know what you’re up to and they will not stand for it.

The resistance has begun.

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comment

Interesting Perspective from Gordon Duff : Enemies Scamming America on Gun Confiscation

Filed under: Black Ops, Conspiracy Theories, Corruption, Fraud, Freedom, Fundamental Rights, Government, Greed, History, Hypocrisy, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Power Struggle, Psy - Ops, Rule Of Law, Security, Self_Defense / Crime Prevention / Security, Special Interests, The American Constitution, Unethical — 1 Comment
January 25, 2013

Gordon Duff with fully automatic assault rifle

We’re From the Guvmint, An We Iz Gonna Hep You Keep Your Guns…

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

Veterans Today

The screw are being turned, every shill, every phony journalist, every corrupt blogger is tasked, bought and paid for, to shut down the truth about Sandy Hook.

Only one politician in the entire country has mentioned gun confiscation, New York governor Andrew Cuomo:

“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

However, the same right wing “bankster and cartel owned and operated police,” the ones who beat down the Occupy movement are now telling us they are ready to fight the federal government over gun confiscation that only exists, quite frankly, in NRA literature, AIPAC blogs and in the weakest of minds.

Anyone who really knows America also knows that the Second Amendment is there to make sure Americans have the guns needed to protect the Constitution and the rest of the amendments.

Historically, the single biggest real threat has been police, state and local authorities, not the federal government.

I do so love it when “jackbooted thugs” tell me they are standing ready to protect me…from themselves?

Sandy Hook, not even thirty dead, is now unfolding as a plot with even more involvement than 9/11.  120 were arrested and secretly released, flown out of the country on 9/11.  At least a hundred more, White House, Justice Department, CIA, NYPD (some, only some) and, especially NORAD and the Pentagon, should have been jailed, tried and executed.

I thought I had seen everything, the massive power of the Israel lobby, AIPAD (C), the Southern Poverty Law Center, the ADL, the more honest Mafia, and every police force in the country, every major press organization and armies of paid liars, smear experts, phony podcast hosts, the scum of the earth, all with one purpose.

Sandy Hook, like 9/11, is an attack on the people of the United States of America.

We have had two kinds of talk that prove something is very wrong.  We have talk about gun confiscation, all from “the lobby” if anyone care to notice the names.

We also have talk about killing “gun confiscators” coming from police and sheriff departments across the very Red States only.

Now, wait a minute, you mean the PO-lice are planning on saving us from government?

Aren’t these the same sheriff’s departments, particularly in the Southwest, the ones that help foreclose on homes, that murder prisoners, that take payoffs from the Mexican cartels and seem to arrive more than a bit late when shootings happen?

At this time and place, the biggest controversy in the country, other than Sandy Hook, is over the control the Israel lobby has had over our congress, how it has controlled our press, how it has sent us to fight illegal wars, how it has pushed us into financial ruin and how we are now beginning to stand up to the bullying.

During the last election, the Israel lobby put in $500 million dollars, money from casino skims in Macao, from human trafficking and child prostitution, from conflict diamonds, all laundered through the Cayman Islands and Cuba.

Allowing this was the Supreme Court by a 5/4 decision under a case termed “Citizens United,” which designated corporations as “people” except they don’t have to die, pay taxes, fight in wars or obey any laws.

Now, letters are being circulated, telling us that President Obama is ordering the military to put commanders in position who are willing to attack American citizens to take away guns.

These stories are fantasies, but they are everywhere.

Read Full Article Here

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

Gun Control : This is going to shock a lot of people.

Filed under: Activism, bureaucracy, Freedom, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, History, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, Indoctrination, Lack Of Transparency, Legislation, National Sovereignty, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Psy - Ops, Racism, Rule Of Law, Secrecy, Security, Special Interests, The American Constitution, Unethical, Weaponry / Armament, Women's Rights — 1 Comment
January 21, 2013

Martin Luther King never jumped on the “gun control” bandwagon.

Here’s the reason why.  Some very deeply suppressed history.

 

Brasscheck  TV

 

The fraud behind disarming citizens

It’s amazing how many people think that the world will be “safer” if law abiding citizens have their guns taken away.

Nonetheless that’s the endless drumbeat of the government and the news media.

There are already hundreds of laws regulating gun possession in the US.

We don’t need more.

So why are gun owners being demonized?

Share this with you anti-gun nut friends who don’t know history and naively believe that the anti-gun grandstanders care about public safety.

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comment

NO RIFLES Used In Sandy Hook Shooting Only Handguns

Filed under: Corruption, crime, Elitist Privilege, Excessive Use Of Force, Fundamental Rights, Government, Government Overreach, Harassment, Hypocrisy, Irrational Violence, Lack Of Transparency, Legislation, Mental Instability, Murder, Politics, Politics, Legislation and Economy News, Psy - Ops, Security, Suicide, The American Constitution, Unethical, Weaponry / Armament — 2 Comments
January 21, 2013

Pretty  speeches that  show an   Agenda way  beore  Sandy  Hook ever  happened.

Blame on an assault  weapon  that  has been proven never  to have  entered  Sandy  Hook Elementary

Hypocrisy stating that assault weapons  should not  be allowed on the streets but  rather on the battlefield.  When his Administration is responsible for how many guns and assault  weapons were  allowed to be put in the hands of Mexican Cartel members? 

Or are  drug  dealers  not criminals now?

*******************************************************************************************

Published on Jan 18, 2013

December 15, 2012 MSNBC News
http://MOXNews.com

Not sure about the date on this one

Barrack Obama on Gun Control and Second Amendment

Obama: AK-47s are for soldiers, not criminals

Published on Jul 26, 2012

President Obama forcefully spoke out against gun violence in a New Orleans speech.

For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/cnn

Related articles
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comment
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 729 other followers