Tag Archive: New Jersey


Six months after Hurricane Sandy, thousands are still homeless

Posted:   04/28/2013 12:01:00 AM MDT

By Wayne Parry
The Associated Press

Flags decorate a fence around the burned remains of more than 60 small bungalows Thursday at Camp Osborn in Brick, N.J. The structures were destroyed by Hurricane Sandy in October. Six months after the storm, recovery has been slow. (Mel Evans, The Associated Press)

MANTOLOKING, n.j. — The 9-year-old girl who got New Jersey’s tough-guy governor to shed a tear as he comforted her after her home was destroyed is bummed because she now lives far from her best friend and has nowhere to hang her One Direction posters.

A New Jersey woman whose home was overtaken by mold still cries when she drives through the area. A New York City man whose home burned can’t wait to build a new one.

Six months after Hurricane Sandy devastated the Jersey shore and New York City and pounded coastal areas of New England, the region is dealing with a slow and frustrating recovery.

“Some families and some lives have come back together quickly and well, and some people are up and running almost as if nothing ever happened, and for them it’s been fine,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a news conference Thursday. “Some people are still very much in the midst of recovery. You still have people in hotel rooms, you still have people doubled up, you still have people fighting with insurance companies, and for them it’s been terrible and horrendous.”

Lynda Fricchione’s flood-damaged home in the Ortley Beach section of Toms River, N.J., is gutted. The roof was fixed just last week.

The family is largely living out of cardboard boxes in an apartment. Waiting for a decision from federal and state authorities over new flood maps that govern the price of flood insurance is tormenting her and many others.

“The largest problem is, nobody really knows how high we’re going to have to elevate the house,” she said. “At town hall, they told us 5 feet, but then they said it might go down to 3 feet in the summer. Most of us are waiting until the final maps come out. It’s wait-and-see.”

More than anything, Fricchione is optimistic, buoyed by a recent trip to New Orleans with her daughter during which they met a resident of the Lower Ninth Ward who was one of the first to move back in after Hurricane Katrina.

“Talking to that man was wonderful!” Fricchione said. “He said it takes time and you just have to have hope and know it will all work out eventually.”

The recovery from Hurricane Sandy, which struck Oct. 29, has been slow. From Maryland to New Hampshire, the National Hurricane Center attributes 72 deaths directly to Sandy and 87 others indirectly from causes such as hypothermia due to power outages, carbon-monoxide poisoning and accidents during cleanup efforts.

Read Full Article Here

*************************************************************************************************************************************

Thousands still homeless after Sandy

Published time: April 29, 2013 19:06

A destroyed by Superstorm Sandy home is viewed in Oakwood Beach in Staten Island on February 5, 2013 in New York City. (AFP Photo / Spencer Platt)

A destroyed by Superstorm Sandy home is viewed in Oakwood Beach in Staten Island on February 5, 2013 in New York City. (AFP Photo / Spencer Platt)

Tens of thousands of Hurricane Sandy victims still remain homeless, desperately waiting for government assistance while fearfully anticipating the start of another hurricane season.

Some victims are living out of cardboard boxes, overstaying their welcomes at the homes of friends and family while their own houses remain demolished. Families remain separated, dispersed throughout the country as they continue to fight with their insurance companies for assistance that has never come. Businesses are shuttered, homes are overtaken by mold and piles of rubble litter the backyards of the houses that now stand empty.

Victims relying on subsidized hotel rooms could soon end up on the streets, since government relief funding is set to expire. Advocates claim there is not enough public and low-income housing to accommodate the hundreds who have relied on FEMA-subsidized hotel rooms for the past six months.

In the seaside community of Breezy Point, Queens, 2,400 of the 2,800 homes remain unoccupied. The neighborhood stands as a ghost town, illuminated only by the flames of the fire burning down the houses red-tagged for demolition.

“Insurance and the new building codes delay everything. It’s like Breezy is frozen in time,” Michael Sullivan, a resident of the seaside community, told the New York Daily News.

And after six months of a gruelingly slow recovery, tens of thousands of residents remain homeless, dreaming of a normal life that they may never be able to return to.

“Some people are still very much in the midst of recovery. You still have people in hotel rooms, you still have people doubling up, you still have people fighting with insurance companies, and for them it’s been terrible and horrendous,” said Gov. Andrew Cuomo, ahead of the six-month anniversary of Hurricane Sandy.

 

Read Full Article Here

About these ads

 

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Members of Congress Begin to Question Large Scale Homeland Security Ammo Purchases

Frank Simms

Activist Post

In the last year and a half the Department of Homeland Security has purchased upwards of 2 billion rounds of ammunition that many believe will eventually be used within the United States and on the American people.

The alternative media and even a few select mainstream reporters have heavily questioned these purchases and theorized about their actual purpose, with many coming to the conclusion that there is simply no other explanation as to what DHS has planned other than confronting some sort of massive civil unrest.

More recently, over a dozen Congressman have either individually demanded answers from the DHS or have signed onto a letter calling for an investigation into the ammo buildup.

On Friday March 15th, New Jersey Congressman Leonard Lance, speaking at a Morristown Tea Party Organization meeting, was asked about the Homeland Security ammo buildup by a concerned citizen.
In response to the question Lance called for Congress to immediately get involved and demand answers from DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano.

I think Congress should ask the Department about both of those issues and I would like a full explanation as to why that has been done and I have every confidence that the oversight committee should ask those questions.

Congress has a responsibility to ask Secretary Napolitano as to exactly why these purchases have occurred.

Less than a week later, during an interview with We Are Change reporter Luke Rudkowski at the annual CPAC convention, Congressman Timothy Huelscamp revealed that DHS had actually refused to provide multiple Congressmen with any information on their massive ammo buildup.

They have no answer for that question. They refuse to answer that.

I’ve got a list of various questions of agencies about multiple things. Far from being the most transparent administration in the world, they are the most closed and opaque.

They refuse to let us know what is going on, so I don’t really have an answer for that. Multiple members of Congress are asking those questions.

Number of gun companies refusing to sell to gov’t entities restricting gun rights triples in just two weeks

By Madison Ruppert

Editor of End the Lie

(Image credit: barjack/Flickr)

(Image credit: barjack/Flickr)

When Brent Daggett originally reported on firearm companies refusing to sell their products to government entities enforcing what they see as gun control laws that endanger our Second Amendment right to bear arms for End the Lie, the number of companies was quite small.

That has radically changed recently with the number tripling in just two weeks. Now some 124 companies have joined the fight against restrictive gun laws according the Police Loophole, a website established to track “companies that have taken the step to publicly announce that they will not sell items to states, counties, cities, and municipalities that restrict their citizens’ rights to own them.”

The number continues to rise and according to Gregory Gwyn-Williams, Jr. of CNS News, “In just two weeks, the number of companies participating in what has been named the ‘Firearms Equality Movement,’ has more than tripled from 34 companies to 118.”

The number has now swelled to 124, although it is unclear where Gwyn-Williams, Jr. obtained the 118 number for his March 9 report since it should have been 123 on March 9, according to the Police Loophole’s dates.

Barrett summed up the movement well in writing, “Barrett opposes those who are illegally disarming the American public from their efficient arms and creating superior armed elitist government agencies.”

The most recent company to join the fray, C. and H. Arms, revealed their decision in a Facebook post.

“Even though we love to support our nations law enforcement agencies,” C. and H. Arms wrote, “We will not sell any item to any agency that restricts said item to its civilians.”

Wilson Combat announced their policy, which applies to California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Washington, D.C. and Chicago, Illinois on February 28.

“Wilson Combat will no longer provide any products or services to any State Government imposing legislation that infringes on the second amendment rights of its law abiding citizens,” wrote Ryan Wilson, Vice President of Wilson Combat.

Read Full Article Here

 

*******************************************************************************************

 

Wilson Combat Joins Over 100 Companies Boycotting Law Enforcement Sales

762x40-download-wallpaper

Wilson Combat, famous manufacturer of premium 1911 pistols and AR-15 rifles, had put themselves on the ever-growing list of manufacturers who are making it a matter of policy to not supply law enforcement in states with prohibitive gun control.

Simply put, if your people don’t have access to the guns they want, neither can your police.

“Wilson Combat will no longer provide any products or services to any State Government imposing legislation that infringes on the Second Amendment rights of its law-abiding citizens. This includes any Law Enforcement Department, Law Enforcement Officers, or any State Government Entity or Employee of such an entity. This also applies to any local municipality imposing such infringements.

“States currently included in our No-Sale Policy are: California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Washington D.C. and Chicago, Illinois.

“Wilson Combat will in no way support the government of these states or their anti-gun agenda that only limits the rights of law-abiding citizens. Wilson Combat will continue to supply any product and/or service they can legally sell in these states to all non-government affiliated citizens.”

 

Read Full Article Here

 

******************************************************************************************

 

Magpul Joins Over 100 Companies Boycotting Law Enforcement Sales

3/04/13 | by  120 3018

magpul-colorado-update-130227-2

In a recent announcement, Magpul is enacting a new policy where they will not sell to law enforcement in states with laws banning certain firearms or with magazine capacity limits. They’re one of more than 100 companies that have similar policies.

While a few notable companies have had similar policies for years, the number of companies who are now boycotting law enforcement agencies has ballooned following the recent surge of new gun control laws.

Magpul’s policy will halt all law enforcement sales for now, and may in the future include a provision to sell to individual officers who “uphold their oath to the U.S. Constitution — specifically the Second and Fourteenth amendments — as it applies to all citizens.”

Some have criticized this as a half-measure, saying that officers may make hollow pledges to Magpul in order to purchase their products, and that this is more of a marketing move.

Others are defending the policy. Right now it’s hard and fast, with an end to all law enforcement officers in so-called “ban states.” Citing Magpul’s other contributions to the ongoing fight for gun rights, including direct action in their home state of Colorado against recent gun control legislation and their prioritization of sales to Colorado residents as indicators of Magpul’s sincerity, many are backing the company with its decision to halt or at least severely curtail sales to law enforcement in those states.

Magpul has also announced that they will relocate pending a Colorado magazine capacity limit, saying that it would be hypocritical for them to pay taxes to support a state that would restrict its residents’ rights.

LaRue Tactical, Spike’s Tactical, Barrett, Bravo Company USA, Primary Weapon Systems, Midway USA, CMMG, Volquartsen Custom, Wilson Combat and Vltor are other big names in the industry that are enforcing similar policies with regards to sales to law enforcement. The list of companies that are officially boycotting law enforcement is up to 117 (at the time of writing).

 

Read Full Article Here

 

*******************************************************************************************

Gun Companies Refuse Sales to State Governments with Strict Gun Laws

 1695
 93
 65.5K

Six gun companies have announced plans to stop selling any of their products to any government agency in states that severely limit the rights of private gun ownership.

Disappointed with New York State lawmakers and other jurisdictions around the country who have passed strict gun control legislation, the companies—composed of firearm manufacturers, gunsmiths, and sporting goods retailers—have announced these policies in the past week.

Their various statements emphasize that such laws create a class of government employees with rights and and a class of citizens without rights. Thus, they refuse to aid the enforcement of such inequality.

The announcements read:

Effective today, in an effort to see that no legal mistakes are made by LaRue Tactical and/or its employees, we will apply all current State and Local Laws (as applied to civilians) to state and local law enforcement / government agencies. In other words, LaRue Tactical will limit all sales to what law-abiding citizens residing in their districts can purchase or possess.

Due the passing of this legislation, Olympic Arms would like to announce that the State of New York, any Law Enforcement Departments, Law Enforcement Officers, First Responders within the State of New York, or any New York State government entity or employee of such an entity – will no longer be served as customers.

In short, Olympic Arms will no longer be doing business with the State of New York or any governmental entity or employee of such governmental entity within the State of New York – henceforth and until such legislation is repealed, and an apology made to the good people of the State of New York and the American people.

The Federal Government and several states have enacted gun control laws that restrict the public from owning and possessing certain types of firearms. Law-enforcement agencies are typically exempt from these restrictions. EFI, LLC does not recognize law-enforcement exemptions to local, state, and federal gun control laws. If a product that we manufacture is not legal for a private citizen to own in a jurisdiction, we will not sell that product to a law-enforcement agency in that jurisdiction.

 

 

Read Full Article Here

 

******************************************************************************************

 

Tuesday, 05 March 2013 12:04

New York Courts May Kill Cuomo Assault on Gun Rights

Written by 

In a move widely celebrated by activists, New York Supreme Court justices last week ordered Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration to prove by the end of next month that its recent assault on gun rights is actually constitutional — critics and experts say it clearly violates both the U.S. and state constitutions. The extraordinary speed used to adopt the controversial legislation, which appears to have violated a separate provision in the state constitution, is also facing scrutiny from the judicial branch.

If the state government fails to prove its case on both counts in the time frame provided, the unprecedented attack on gun rights may be struck down entirely, or at least temporarily rendered void. Gun rights activists have been pursuing multiple strategies to defeat the controversial infringements on the right to keep and bear arms adopted in New York. However, attacking them in the courts is seen by activists as among the most viable, at least at this point.

The statute in question, the so-called “NY SAFE Act,” purports to limit firearms to seven rounds and ban most semi-automatic weapons and standard-capacity magazines. Other unconstitutional and highly controversial provisions aim to, for example, mandate gun-owner registration with authorities while demanding government approval for virtually every firearm transfer.

Activists have already promised to defy the unconstitutional restrictions, and thousands of protesters recently converged on Albany calling on “King” Cuomo to resign or even be tried for treason owing to his blatant disregard for his oath of office and the lawless assault on the Constitution. The protests are getting bigger and louder even as the state faces an avalanche of lawsuits to overturn its lawless assault on the rights of law-abiding New Yorkers.

Amid the anti-gun rights hysteria whipped up by the increasingly discredited establishment media after the massacre of children in a Connecticut “gun-free zone,” the controversial “NY SAFE Act” was rammed through the legislature with arm-twisting from Gov. Cuomo on January 15. It passed just hours after being introduced — an apparent violation of the state Constitution, which generally requires three days before legislation can be passed unless there is an emergency.

In fact, the legislation’s approval was so rushed that lawmakers, most of whom apparently did not even read the bill, failed to exempt police officers from the draconian restrictions, sparking a mad dash to amend the statute before law-enforcement officials also become criminals. Across the state, sheriffs and other top law-enforcement officials have expressed serious concerns about the legislation, too — especially because of the brazen infringements on God-given rights of citizens and the violation of the U.S. and state constitutions they all took an oath to uphold.

If gun owners get their way and the state is forced to obey the U.S. and New York constitutions, however, it may all be a moot point. Last week, in two separate orders, state Supreme Court justices ordered the embattled Cuomo administration to explain itself and its unconstitutional infringements on the unalienable right to keep and bear arms enshrined in both the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the New York Constitution.

The first order, issued by State Supreme Justice Deborah Chimes on February 27, demands that the state government prove that its unprecedented infringements on gun rights are indeed constitutional by April 29. The lawsuit was initiated by gun dealer Edward Holtz, who argues that the unconstitutional statute, among other problems, put him out of business, left him with merchandise he cannot sell, and violates his rights. According to the order issued by Justice Chimes, if the state is unable to prove that its statute is constitutional by the deadline, she will temporarily enjoin it.

 

Read Full Article Here

  • Boston could get up to two feet of snow and New York City about half that in weekend storm as two storm systems merge
  • Boston under blizzard watch Friday through Saturday with hurricane force wind gusts expected
  • Forecasts are varied and some predict the majority of snowfall will be further north

By Daily Mail Reporter

A potentially historic Nor’easter is churning its way toward the Northeast with potential hurricane force wind gusts and blizzard conditions dumping as much as two feet of snow in some places on Friday and Saturday.

While the actual trajectory for the storm is still unknown, New York City could get around 10 inches and Boston could get slammed with as much as two feet with winds gusts up to 55 mph.

A blizzard watch is now in effect starting Friday morning for much of Eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island with travel not recommended amid fears of dangerous white out conditions, the National Weather Service reports.

kSnowbelt: The East Coast could get hit with up to 12 inches of snow as a powerful system moves east
kVariations on a storm: However, other weather prediction services show that the majority of the storm will be further north
Path: By Friday evening at 7pm the storm is projected to be just off the eastern coast of New Jersey as depicted by NOAA herePath: By Friday evening at 7pm the storm is projected to be just off the eastern coast of New Jersey as depicted by NOAA here

Knee deep: An accumulated snow forecast from Intellicast shows one storm system coming across the Midwest into the East CoastKnee deep: An accumulated snow forecast from Intellicast shows one storm system coming across the Midwest into the East Coast

The National Weather Service is forecasting ‘a potential historic winter storm and blizzard’ in Boston while issuing a blizzard watch throughout the area from Friday until Saturday afternoon.

They report the heaviest snow to begin falling on Friday night into Saturday morning with 2-3 inches per hour possible and visibility less than a quarter of a mile or less at times.

Just south, most of New York state is under its own winter storm watch with snow likely to begin falling by early Friday morning and develop into heavier snowfall throughout the afternoon.

Heavy rain, snow, and wind gusts possibly more than 50 mph are expected throughout Metro New York, Long Island, Connecticut and up into Orange county, New Jersey creating fears of potential power outages in freezing conditions and drifting and blowing snow making roads impassable according to NOAA.

‘As always in the winter season we are prepared for whatever Mother Nature brings,’ New York Sanitation Dept. spokesman Keith Mellis told the New York Post of their 365 salt-spreaders standing by.

‘Once we get a weather forecast that looks like the threat of snow, we have them pre-loaded. They’re our first line of defense,’ he said.

Widespread minor flooding and moderate flooding along shoreline communities is also expected, potentially causing moderate to significant beach erosion among some of the hardest hit areas less than four months after Hurricane Sandy.

The Weather Channel reports that the Midwestern storm pattern, which passed through Chicago and Milwaukee, will mix with wetter weather coming from New Orleans, Louisville, and even Atlanta.

Bundling up: On Friday snow, seen in blue, is expected to blanket parts of the northeast while accompanying patches of ice, seen in pink and purpleBundling up: On Friday snow, seen in blue, is expected to blanket parts of the northeast while accompanying patches of ice, seen in pink and purple

k

Salt of the Earth: Municipal trucks fill up with salt Wednesday in Portsmouth, New Hampshire in preparations for what could be a large snowfall

Read Full Article and  Watch Video Here

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J.

By Michael Isikoff, National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News

U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez this month wrote a $58,500 check to a company owned by a South Florida eye doctor and political fundraiser to reimburse him for two personal flights to the Dominican Republic that the New Jersey Democrat did not report on his Senate financial disclosure form, his office confirmed to NBC News Wednesday night.

The disclosure came as law enforcement sources confirmed that FBI agents searched the West Palm Beach, Florida, offices of the doctor, Salomon Melgen, Tuesday night as part of an investigation that includes agents from the Department of Health and Human Services.

Melgen is a major Democratic political donor and fundraiser who together with family has contributed more than $200,000 to Democratic candidates, including $33,000 to Menendez.

Menendez’s office confirmed that the senator — who this week became chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – wrote the check to Melgen from his personal account after aides reviewed his flight schedule in response to a complaint that a New Jersey Republican official filed with the Senate Ethics Committee last November. The complaint alleged that Menendez violated Senate Ethics rules by “repeatedly flying on a free jet to the Dominican Republic and other locations” and that the jet was provided by Melgen.

 

Read Full Article Here

Sandy Hook massacre: Evidence of official foreknowledge?

The moment it emerged that he was alive and was taken into police custody in Hoboken, New Jersey, many if not all of the statements previously made to the press by anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ regarding Ryan Lanza and his connections could no longer have been known beforehand.

In the following passage of my previous article on the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, I made the following reference to Ryan Lanza being the named second suspect caught armed in the adjacent woods:

Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here. This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.

I have since found the original Associated Press report, which in fact states that it was “Ryan’s younger brother”, Adam Lanza, who was arrested in the woods. So let’s take a closer look at this revealing report.

2:25 p.m. CST — A FoxNews report said:

witnesses said a handcuffed man, dressed in camouflage was led out of a nearby woods by officers who reported to the shooting. The individual is Lanza’s younger brother, according to the Associated Press.

That Fox News report has since been ‘updated’, but here is the full original text and screenshot of the Associated Press report which places both brothers at the scene, one dead (Ryan), and the other arrested (Adam):

 

Read Full Article Here

South Carolina Bill Proposes Jail Time for Feds Trying to Enforce Obamacare

Posted by

South Carolina may soon join the ranks of states struggling to reclaim their constitutional sovereignty stolen from them by the federal government.

 

Using language that would prohibit state officials from participating in the implementation of state healthcare exchanges or from enforcing the individual mandate that are key elements of ObamaCare, Chumley’s measure — the South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act — requires state lawmakers to “prevent the enforcement of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” [ObamaCare] within the limits of this state.”

South Carolina, a state with a long history of resisting federal despotism, joins three other states currently considering bills nullifying ObamaCare. The state legislatures of Maine, New Jersey, and Oklahoma have also had bills introduced aimed at stopping ObamaCare at the state border.

Simply stated, nullification is a concept of constitutional law that recognizes the right of each state to nullify, or invalidate, any federal measure that exceeds the few and defined powers allowed the federal government as enumerated in the Constitution. Nullification is founded on the assertion that the sovereign states formed the union, and as creators of the compact, they hold ultimate authority as to the limits of the power of the central government to enact laws that are applicable to the states and the citizens thereof.

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s ObamaCare decision, state legislators and governors are boldly asserting their right to restrain the federal government, and are accordingly considering bills that will stop ObamaCare’s multitude of mandates at the state border.

As quoted in a story published by the Tenth Amendment Center, Chumley said he will offer this bill (H 3101) “because of federal over-reach” and because following the Constitution “is the right thing to do.”

Chumley references both the creation and the construction of the Constitution in the text of his bill nullifying ObamaCare:

Whereas, the people of the several states comprising the United States of America created the federal government to be their agent for certain enumerated purposes, and nothing more; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people of the several states to the federal government, and all power not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution of the United States is reserved to the states respectively, or to the people themselves; and

Whereas, Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution provides in pertinent part that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States”; and

Whereas, the judicial decision of the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” directly contravenes Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution because, in upholding the law by recharacterizing the Act as a tax even though Congress specifically refused to identify it as a tax, the United States Supreme Court legislated new law in violation of Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, the assumption of power that the federal government has made by enacting the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” interferes with the right of the people of the State of South Carolina to regulate health care as they see fit and makes a mockery of James Madison’s assurance in Federalist #45 that the “powers delegated” to the federal government are “few and defined,” while those of the states are “numerous and indefinite.”

Joining Chumley in the fight to prevent the federal government from reducing the states to mere administrative units of the central government, Maine State Representative Aaron Libby (R-North Waterboro) “will sponsor a bill in the 2013 legislative session declaring the PPACA [ObamaCare] unconstitutional and void in the Pine Tree State. If passed, the bill would set the stage for blocking implementation of the mandatory federal health care system in Maine….” reported the Tenth Amendment Center.

In New Jersey, Assemblywoman Alison McHose (R-Morris, Sussex, and Warren) will reintroduce a meaure nullifying ObamaCare in the Garden State. Her bill, A 861, declares that ObamaCare is “null and void and of no force and effect in the State of New Jersey.”

Another state representative is having to combat not only federal tyranny, but resistance to nullification from state government officials, as well. Oklahoma State Representative (and doctor) Mike Ritze is finding increased reluctance on the part of state officials to heed the express wishes of the citizens of the Sooner State to nullify the federal healthcare power grab.

In an e-mail to this author, Representative Ritze reports that in response to a letter sent by him to Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma Solicitor General Patrick Wyrick claims that “it should be noted that the Sebelius court [in the ObamaCare decision] held that while the federal government cannot mandate Americans to buy health insurance, it can tax those who do not.” [Emphasis in original.]

 

Read Full Article Here

Politics, Legislation and Economy News

 

Governor Chris Christie holds a press conference at a Relief Center at the Joseph R. Bolger Middle School in the wake of Hurricane Sandy in Keansburg, New Jersey November 5, 2012, in this handout image courtesy of the governor's office. REUTERS/New Jersey Governor's Office/Tim Larsen/Handout

By Peter Rudegeair

Fri Dec 7, 2012 2:44am EST

 

Christie, whose announcement came on a day when he was visiting the White House to discuss tens of billions in federal recovery aid after Superstorm Sandy, joined 18 other states in rejecting a measure to create state-based health insurance markets where consumers could purchase private, federally subsidized coverage.

Christie, a Republican who has nurtured a reputation as a cost cutter, cited uncertainty over what such an exchange would cost the state and over what kind of flexibility New Jersey will have in managing it.

“I will not ask New Jerseyans to commit today to a state-based exchange when the federal government cannot tell us what it will cost, how that cost compares to other options, and how much control they will give the states over this option that comes at the cost of our state’s taxpayers,” Christie said in a statement.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has set a December 14 deadline for states to decide whether they will participate in state-based, federal or partnership exchange. Some 18 states have said they will create their own state-based exchanges and another 18 plan to default to a federal exchange, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

This marks the second time this year that Christie vetoed an attempt to create a state healthcare exchange. He rejected a similar bill in May on the grounds that the healthcare law, called the Affordable Care Act, might be unconstitutional, a view the Supreme Court rebuffed when it ruled in favor of the law in June.

The veto also comes as Christie pressed his case in closed door meetings with Obama and House Speaker John Boehner for funds to finance clean-up and rebuilding efforts following the storm.

New Jersey and New York officials are seeking $80 billion, despite a media report that the White House will request only $50 billion.

(Reporting By Peter Rudegeair; Editing by Paul Thomasch and Philip Barbara)

Mayor Cory Booker to Live off Food Stamps For A Week

 

Booker proposed the challenge after getting into a Twitter discussion with a user named TwitWit, who describes herself on Twitter as a “Daughter of the American Revolution, fighting against any and all forms of socialism/communism.. Army Veteran, Army Daughter, Army Wife.”

At first, Booker had tweeted a Greek proverb:

An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics.

TwitWit accused Booker of wanting to redistribute wealth, and then the two eventually began talking about the government’s role in funding school breakfast and lunch programs. TwitWit stated that nutrition is not the responsibility of the government.

Booker responded:

We have a shared responsibility that kids go to school nutritionally ready 2 learn.

Eventually the conversation turned to food stamps when TwitWit wrote:

why is there a family today that is “too poor to afford breakfast”? are they not already receiving food stamps?

That’s when Booker followed up with the challenge:

Lets you and I try to live on food stamps in New Jersey (high cost of living) and feed a family for a week or month. U game?

TwitWit agreed to the challenge.

In New Jersey, according the 2011 fiscal year, the average monthly food stamp benefit was $133.26 a person. Meaning, those taking the challenge will have to live on about $4 dollars a day.

According to the Associated Press, Booker told reporters, “This will not be a gimmick or a stunt,” but provides an opportunity “for us to grow in compassion and understanding” and dispel stereotypes. A few months ago, a Phoenix Mayor also tried to live on a food stamp budget and noted that he was “tired” and it was “hard to focus.”

The AP also landed an interview with TwitWit, who is a 39-year-old woman from North Carolina and who said she does not oppose food stamps, but thinks that the more taxpayer money designated to the food stamp program, the more people will need them.

She told the AP, “There is going to be a lot more of us needing those food stamps if it doesn’t stop.”

Ironically, she seemed in need of some financial relief as well, stating that her family is “Six months away from being in debt and on welfare ourselves.”

She added, “Most of us are in the same boat. … Some of us just aren’t getting the assistance.”

Meanwhile, FOX News has reported on Booker’s challenge with an extreme insensitivity toward food stamp recipients.

Media Matters reported that FOX pundit Andrea Tantaros disgustingly said she “would ‘look fabulous’ if she were forced to on a food stamp diet.”

Watch the video here:

Earth Watch Report  -  Disaster Management

DISASTER MANAGEMENT

Victims of Hurricane Sandy forgotten in Haiti

by Staff Writers
Petit-Goave, Haiti (AFP)

 

Flooding from Sandy killed 54 people and left thousands homeless in Haiti, another woe for a country still struggling to recover from a 2010 earthquake that left more than 200,000 dead.

A cholera epidemic that broke out afterwards has since killed around 7,600 people but even its effect worsened with the recent rains — 44 deaths were reported in the past month, according to Haiti’s Ministry for Public Health.

Nearly a month after the government of President Michel Martelly declared a national emergency due to Sandy, scores of residents in the hard-hit town of Petit-Goave, in south-western Haiti, still live in emergency shelters.

In the Nan banann (Among the Bananas) neighborhood located between the Caiman river and the sea, residents mourn their dead outside homes still buried under layers of mud and banana trees swept in by flood waters.

“It’s the Caiman river that is the cause of our misfortunes,” said Elnee Prophete, one of the storm victims.

“When it overflows, it sweeps away everything in its path,” Prophete said, pointing to what remains of her house, buried to the roof in a reddish mud.

Some neighborhood families were given shelter in a school in another neighborhood. Others, however, chose to stay in place.

Marie-Yolaine, 24, is distraught over the loss of her young to the storm. She refuses to speak about her experience. “What’s the point?” she whispers, tears streaming from her eyes.

At Nan banann, which was built next to the Petit-Goave cemetery, “there is no separation between the living and the dead,” said Guy Mathieu, owner of a local radio station.

According to Mathieu, Petit-Goave’s geography “is like a bowl, where the water of several rivers pours in.”

Dordy Charles, a resident who advocates building stone levees to keep the rivers from overflowing, blames many of the town’s woes on flooding.

“The problem is the water, and learning how to manage it is the solution,” Charles said.

Sandy flooded several Petit-Goave neighborhoods, including Acul, founded in 1663. Acul was “the first capital” of neighboring Spanish-speaking Santo Domingo, which shares the island of Hispaniola with Haiti, Mathieu said.

The radio station owner notes with some bitterness that Petit-Goave is preparing to mark the 350th anniversary of its foundation next year.

“We sleep with one eye open”

In the vulnerable neighborhoods, catastrophe is on the mind each time it rains. “We sleep with one eye open,” a young man told AFP.

Since Sandy struck and the first Haitian emergency workers briefly visited Petit-Goave, “nobody has come to see us,” complained Paguy Labbard, who is living in the shelter along with 300 other people.

“We were thrown into a school where adults and children sleep on the same ground, we have received no assistance,” said Labbard.

Immaculee Achille, who lost her home to the 2010 earthquake, found herself in the shelter again, this time with the eight grandchildren she has been caring for since the quake killed their parents.

“We cannot go back home, everything has been swept away,” said Achille. “But we do not want to stay here.”

She wants government help. The first day after the hurricane tore through she recalls receiving a warm plate of food from emergency workers.

“Since then … nothing,” Achille said.

.

Related Links
Bringing Order To A World Of Disasters
A world of storm and tempest
When the Earth Quakes

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 739 other followers