Tag Archive: Bundestag


Cyprus president says depositors had to pay to avoid bankruptcy

Cyprus' President Nicos Anastasiades arrives at a European Union leaders summit in Brussels March 14, 2013. REUTERS/Eric Vidal

NICOSIA | Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:38pm EDT

(Reuters) – Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades said on Saturday a levy on bank depositors was a painful decision he had to make in order to obtain financial aid, or else the island’s economy would have gone bankrupt.

Anastasiades, elected three weeks ago with a pledge to negotiate a swift bailout, said refusal to agree to terms would have led to the collapse of the island’s two largest banks.

The president said he would make a state address on Sunday, when the island’s parliament was scheduled to meet in an emergency session to decide whether to approve the measure.

The eastern Mediterranean nation becomes the fifth country after Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain to turn to the euro zone for financial aid.

But in a radical departure from previous aid packages – and one which triggered fury across the island – euro zone finance ministers forced Cyprus’s savers to forfeit up to 10 percent of their deposits to raise almost 6 billion euros.

“On Tuesday … we would either chose the catastrophic scenario of disorderly bankruptcy or the scenario of a painful but controlled management of the crisis,” Anastasiades said in a written statement.

Had Cyprus chosen the “catastrophic scenario”, he said, from Tuesday one of the two distressed banks would have ceased to operate since the European Central Bank had already decided to terminate provision of emergency liquidity assistance (ELA).

“The second bank would suspend its work, and neither could avoid collapse,” he said.

Although he did not name the banks, he was referring to Cyprus Popular Bank, the recipient of the ELA facility for months, and Bank of Cyprus, the island’s largest bank.

If the banks collapsed, he said, the state would be obliged to compensate depositors with a bill potentially reaching 30 billion euros, which the state would be unable to pay.

Thousands of Cypriots converged on automatic teller machines on Saturday to withdraw cash, leaving many inoperative by mid-afternoon. Co-operative credit societies, normally open for business on Saturdays, were forced to close to prevent a run on deposits.

(Reporting by Michele Kambas; Editing by Jason Webb)

******************************************************************

Cyprus’ savers bear brunt of unprecedented bailout

People gather at an automatic teller machine in Nicosia March 16, 2013. REUTERS-Yiannis Nisiotis
People gather at an automatic teller machine in Nicosia March 16, 2013. REUTERS-Yiannis Nisiotis

By Annika Breidthardt and Robin Emmott and Michele Kambas

BRUSSELS/NICOSIA | Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:52pm EDT

(Reuters) – The euro zone agreed on Saturday to hand Cyprus a bailout worth 10 billion euros ($13 billion), but demanded depositors in its banks forfeit some money to stave off bankruptcy despite the risk of a wider run on savings.

The eastern Mediterranean island becomes the fifth country after Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain to turn to the euro zone for financial help during the region’s debt crisis.

In a radical departure from previous aid packages – and one that gave rise to incredulity and anger across the country – euro zone finance ministers forced Cyprus’ savers to pay up to 10 percent of their deposits to raise almost 6 billion euros.

Parliament was due to meet on Sunday to vote on the measure, and approval was far from assured.

The decision prompted a run on cashpoints, most of which were depleted by mid afternoon, and co-operative credit societies closed to prevent angry savers withdrawing deposits.

Almost half Cyprus’s bank depositors are believed to be non-resident Russians, but most queuing on Saturday at automatic teller machines appeared to be Cypriots.

President Nicos Anastasiades, elected three weeks ago with a pledge to negotiate a swift bailout, said refusal to agree to terms would have led to the collapse of the two largest banks.

“On Tuesday … We would either choose the catastrophic scenario of disorderly bankruptcy or the scenario of a painful but controlled management of the crisis,” Anastasiades said in written statement.

In several statements since his election, he had previously categorically ruled out a deposit haircut.

“My initial reaction is one of shock,” said Nicholas Papadopoulos, head of parliament’s financial affairs committee. “This decision is much worse than what we expected and contrary to what the government was assuring us, right up until last night,” he told Reuters, without saying whether he would back the measure or whether he thought it would pass.

Papadopoulos is vice-chairman of the Democratic Party, a partner in Cyprus’s centre-right ruling coalition and whose support in parliament will be crucial to pass any haircut.

Parliament was expected to convene from 1600 local (1400 GMT) on Sunday to discuss the emergency legislation. Without parliamentary approval, a haircut cannot take place.

‘THEFT, PURE AND SIMPLE’

Read Full Article Here

******************************************************************

Analysis: Cyprus bank levy risks dangerous euro zone precedent

A man withdraws money from an automatic teller machine at a branch of Bank of Cyprus, in Athens March 16, 2013. REUTERS/Yannis Behrakis

By Mike Peacock

LONDON | Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:55pm EDT

(Reuters) – A hit imposed on Cypriot bank depositors by the euro zone has shocked and alarmed politicians and bankers who fear the currency bloc has set a precedent that will unnerve investors and citizens alike.

After all-night Friday talks, euro finance ministers agreed a 10 billion euro ($13 billion) bailout for the stricken Mediterranean island and said since so much of its debt was rooted in its banks, that sector would have to bear a large part of the burden.

In a radical departure from previous aid packages – and one that gave rise to incredulity and anger across Cyprus – the ministers are forcing the nation’s savers to pay up to 10 percent of their deposits to raise almost 6 billion euros.

The European Central Bank’s pledge to buy euro zone government bonds in unlimited amounts if needed has calmed the beleaguered currency bloc for the past five months. But if investors fear the Cypriot template could be repeated in any future rescues, that calm could be shattered.

Without a bailout, Cyprus would default, which could unravel the investor confidence fostered by the ECB.

Politicians, bankers and analysts said the levy could undermine banks in other euro zone countries, even though the ministers insisted it was a one-off and Cyprus represents just 0.2 percent of euro zone economic output.

“The unprecedented move is an extreme measure, and in our view it will spread some panic across the EMU periphery, and we cannot rule out some capital outflows,” said Annalisa Piazza at Newedge Strategy.

“In the short run we expect some effects on periphery’s (bond yield) spreads and some weakening of the euro cannot be ruled out,” Piazza said.

The decision sent Cypriots scurrying to the cash points, most of which were emptied within hours. Most have been unable to access their bank accounts since Saturday morning, a move unlikely to engender calm.

Euro zone policymakers made a point of saying they would monitor any signs of money moving out of Cyprus but did not say how they might react in the event.

“For us, Cyprus is systemically relevant. Despite the small size of the economy, disorderly developments in Cyprus could undermine the important progress made in 2012 in stabilizing the euro zone,” ECB policymaker Joerg Asmussen said after the Eurogroup meeting concluded before dawn on Saturday.

A Cypriot bank holiday on Monday will limit any immediate reaction. The deposit levy – set at 9.9 percent on bank deposits exceeding 100,000 euros and 6.7 percent on anything below that – will be imposed on Tuesday, if voted through in parliament.

That is not certain to happen, but fear of the alternative – probable default – will focus minds.

Read Full Article Here

******************************************************************

Our troops ‘safe’ from Cyprus bank raid

TROOPS whose savings are set to be ransacked in a European Union bank raid will get full compensation from the Government, George Osborne said yesterday.

Published: Mon, March 18, 2013

Cyprus-is-in-financial-turmoil Cyprus is in financial turmoil
Thousands of military personnel stationed in Cyprus are expected to be among British expat victims of a swingeing levy of up to 10 per cent on bank deposits. It has been imposed by the Cypriot government as part of a £9billion EU bail-out deal.Up to 60,000 UK citizens could lose part of their nest eggs in the astonishing move designed to shore up the debt-laden Cypriot economy.

The Chancellor announced that troops and UK government officials in Cyprus will get compensation. But most expats will get nothing.

Mr Osborne said on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show: “For people serving in our military and our government out in Cyprus, we are going to compensate anyone affected by this bank tax.”

Treasury officials estimate that around 3,000 UK military personnel and 150 civil servants live in Cyprus.

 The Chancellor has moved quickly to ease the fears of Britons

For people serving in our military and our government out in Cyprus, we are going to compensate anyone affected by this bank tax.

Chancellor George Osborne

Under the bail-out plan, a 10 per cent levy will be imposed on deposits of £85,000 or more and 6.75 per cent on lower sums. Cypriot government ministers will today debate whether to proceed with the measure, which has been sanctioned by EU officials.British expats, who are estimated to have £1.7billion in deposits and could lose up to £170million as part of the levy, were furious yesterday.

Sue Hall, 54, a British businesswoman living on the island, feared her firm could lose around £3,500.

She said: “It is outrageous. This is down to the EU, they are picking on Cyprus because it’s a small country.”

 Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades speaking to the people of Cyprus in a televised address

Dennis Wheatley, 78, a former postman from Coventry, pleaded with the Prime Minister to help pensioners. He says the tax will cost him around £1,300. “I came here because I wanted a wonderful life in retirement,” he said. “David Cameron should be making sure pensioners are looked after.”

Michael and Jennifer Garbett, from Castleford, West Yorkshire, said it made them question why they are living in Cyprus. Mr Garbett, 68, a retired publican, said: “We will be stung. I reckon it could result in lots of people going back home.”

Panic was spreading yesterday as savers queued at cash machines. One customer parked his tractor outside a bank in Limassol in frustration.

Cypriot bank officials said depositors could access all their cash – except the amount due in the levy.

 

********************************************************************************

 

 

Putin Blasts Cyprus Levy on Bank Deposits as ‘Unfair’

Putin Blasts Cyprus Levy on Bank Deposits as ‘Unfair’

Putin Blasts Cyprus Levy on Bank Deposits as ‘Unfair’

© AFP 2013/ Barbara Laborde

17:53 18/03/2013
Originally posted at 13:57.

MOSCOW, March 18 (RIA Novosti) – Russian President Vladimir Putin believes the Cypriot government’s plans to impose a one-off levy on all bank deposits as part of a bailout deal to get much-needed loans from international creditors would be “unfair, unprofessional and dangerous,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday.

Putin held a meeting Monday with administration staff and economic aides to discuss economic developments in the eurozone, Peskov said.

“In assessing a possible decision to impose an additional tax on bank deposits in Cyprus, Putin said this decision, if made, would be unfair, unprofessional and dangerous,” Peskov quoted Putin as saying.

The European Union and the IMF agreed on Saturday to bail out Cyprus’ debt-laden economy and grant the island nation a loan worth 10 billion euros ($13 billion) in return for the government’s obligation to tax all deposits kept at Cypriot banks.

Under the terms of the bailout deal, Cyprus will have to impose a levy of 6.75 percent on deposits of less than 100,000 euros and 9.9 percent on deposits with greater amounts. Cypriots reacted with shock and rushed to cash machines to withdraw their savings, but many machines refused to pay out.

Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades said he had to choose between the “catastrophic scenario of disorderly bankruptcy and the scenario of a painful but controlled management of the crisis.”

The bailout plan has yet to be approved by Cyprus’ parliament, with the vote on the bank deposit levy scheduled for Tuesday.

Russian banks are heavily exposed to Cyprus risk as they had around $12 billion on deposit with Cypriot banks at the end of last year, with Russian corporate deposits accounting for another $19 billion, according to estimates by Moody’s international rating agency.

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev echoed Putin’s comments on the Cyprus bailout deal, comparing the proposed tax on bank deposits to “the confiscation of other people’s money.”

“Quite strange and controversial decisions [are] being made by some EU member states. I mean Cyprus. Frankly speaking, this looks like the confiscation of other people’s money,” Medvedev said, speaking at a meeting of the supervisory board of national development bank Vnesheconombank.

He added that Russia may have to reconsider its relationship with Cyprus if the island nation introduces the controversial tax on bank deposits, but did not clarify what specifically he had in mind.

Updated with Medvedev’s comments and Cyprus parliament’s decision to postpone voting until Tuesday.

 

Related News

About these ads

Published on Jul 20, 2012 by

Police have used rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse angry protesters thronging the streets of Spain. Dozens of people were injured and a number of activists detained during the latest nationwide anti-austerity demonstrations. In a major show of strength, hundreds of thousands have been taking part in the protests. People marched in 80 cities across the country to protest against more suffocating austerity which is to come. That’s after the German Parliament gave the green light to the 100-billion Euro bailout for the country’s battered banks. The EU’s finance ministers are now expected to approve the conditions for the financial lifeline to Madrid. Carlos Delclos, a sociologist at Pompeu Fabra University, believes the situation in Spain is only going to go from bad to worse.

RT LIVE
http://rt.com/on-air

‘Merkel Is Driving Europe into the Abyss’

Photo Gallery: Spaniards Stage Widespread Austerity Protests

Photos
AP

After Madrid passed a crushing new round of austerity measures on Thursday, the country erupted in widespread protests. Germany did its part to approve the Spanish banking bailout on the same day, but German editorialists question on Friday whether the aid will have the desired effect at home or abroad.

Spain may soon be getting aid for its troubled banking sector, but that appears to be of no comfort to the Spaniards. After Madrid passed another round of tough austerity measures on Thursday, tens of thousands took to the streets in some 80 cities around the country.

 

The protests, which reportedly saw some 100,000 demonstrators in Madrid alone, were called by the CCOO and UGT trade unions, which reject the government’s planned belt-tightening efforts. The two unions have threatened to call a general strike in September. Dozens of injuries and a handful of arrests were reported following scuffles with police.Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy’s conservative People’s Party (PP), which has an absolute majority in parliament, pushed the controversial plan to cut spending by some €65 billion ($80 billion) through parliament on Thursday, despite staunch resistance from the opposition.

The austerity measures include a significant boost in the value-added tax, the abolition of Christmas bonuses for state employees and cuts to unemployment payments. The deep reductions in state spending have been met with widespread resistance, with police officers, firefighters, soldiers, judges and public defenders all taking part in Thursday’s protests.

German Parliament Approves Bank Bailout

The nation remains mired in a crushing recession, with more than 5.6 million unemployed. At a record of around 25 percent, the level is on par with the unemployment rate in the United States during the Great Depression. Meanwhile, it is becoming increasingly difficult for Madrid to access financial markets, as it continues to pay ever-higher interest rates in sovereign bond auctions.

Though Spain has asked for aid to ease its banking crisis, sparked by the collapse of a real estate bubble in 2009, it would prefer not to receive a full-fledged bailout under the euro rescue package. German parliament approved the Spanish bank aid worth up to €100 billion on Thursday, and it is expected to be paid out in several tranches by the temporary euro bailout fund, the European Financial Security Facility (EFSF).

The finance ministers of the 17 euro countries likewise gave the green light to the Spanish banking bailout on Friday. In addition to strict oversight of the banking sector, they will require Madrid to reduce its budget deficit to under 3 percent of gross domestic product by the end of 2014.

On Friday German commentators take stock of Spain’s situation and ask whether German parliamentary approval of the Spanish banking bailout will ultimately make a difference. They also question whether yet another bailout is the right path for Germany and the European Union as a whole.

Financial daily Handelsblatt writes:

“German Chancellor Angela Merkel has managed once again to get a parliamentary majority. But who cares? No one. Regardless of whether the vote passes with or without the opposition, more questions than answers remain. Since the financial crisis began two years ago, euro-zone leaders have passed one aid package after the next, increasing Germany’s liability. Little has come of it. The situation in the debt-ridden countries has not improved.”

“It’s no wonder that Germans are asking why they should have to bail out banks with their hard-earned money when these institutions have only wasted and squandered everything.”

Conservative daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:

“At this point, it has become routine. With stoic expressions, parliamentarians have listened to the government’s reasons why German aid to Europe is unavoidable — and an exception has been made for Spanish banks after already bailing out Greece, Ireland and Portugal while Cyprus has come knocking.”

“No one wants to question the quality of the requirements for Spain, as described by Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble — probably also because the Bundesbank president publicly pledged to ‘broadly tackle’ Spain’s problems, not just focusing on the banks….”

“But this is all just a smokescreen. The reality is that Spain is getting aid with loosened conditions. Soon Italy will ask, too. And the other reality is that, instead of investors, once again (mainly German) taxpayers will have to pay for the faulty speculation of banks.”

Center-left daily Süddeutsche Zeitung writes:

“There is no reason to over-dramatize the situation in Spain. But the social peace is fragile. The outraged citizens have joined up with the unions. There isn’t a single institution of public life that hasn’t been hit by a major crisis of confidence. The royal family, the political system, the economic elite, the justice system and the media have all lost standing. Spain is saving and reforming like never before, writing a debt brake into the constitution and restructuring everything. But hope has become a rare commodity.”

Left-leaning daily Die Tageszeitung writes:

“The discontent (among politicians over the euro crisis) is more than justified. However, euro-zone leaders ought to take a hard look at themselves. They have only themselves to blame for the fact that — after Greece, Ireland and Portugal — now Spain is also on the brink. They recognized far too late that, in addition to a debt crisis, a banking crisis was swelling, too. And the strategy with which they are battling these crises is far too cowardly. Instead of seizing the problem at its roots and restructuring the financial sector (which would also mean bank failures), they are adding to the burdens of the states. This is only exacerbating the vicious circle of debt and banking crises.”

 

“Chancellor Merkel is among the first to blame for this. She forced Spain under the bailout fund and is now trying to sell this as a success. But, in reality, Merkel is driving Europe into the abyss bit by bit.”Conservative daily Die Welt writes:

“The broad majority (on the German vote) contradicts the sentiments of the people, which is certainly a political problem in a democracy. Skeptics and opponents of the euro are hardly present within parliament, which makes saving the euro appear to be an elite project. Still, this broad majority is a strong signal. Unlike some members of the euro zone, Germany is not only economically stable, but also politically robust. … But German stability is no natural law. Merkel’s center-right coalition, stable only in its instability, must envy the opposition. … But the end of this alliance is nigh. … The general election campaign is approaching. It will perhaps be the last time that a clear majority of parliamentarians votes in favor of European solidarity.”

– Kristen Allen

German Parliament Approves Spanish Bank Aid

German Chancellor Angela Merkel together with parliamentarians during Thursday's vote on emergency aid for Spanish banks.Zoom

dapd

German Chancellor Angela Merkel together with parliamentarians during Thursday’s vote on emergency aid for Spanish banks.

Germany’s parliament on Thursday approved up to 100 billion euros in aid to Spanish banks, to be paid by the euro backstop fund EFSF. But despite supporting the measure, the opposition in Berlin is losing its patience with German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s euro bailout policies.

As had been widely expected, a special session of German parliament on Thursday overwhelmingly approved emergency aid for Spanish banks from the temporary euro bailout fund, the European Financial Security Facility (EFSF).

A total of 473 of the 583 lawmakers present in the Bundestag voted in favor of the measure with Merkel’s conservatives combined with the business-friendly Free Democrats, her junior coalition partner, offering broad support. Still, initial reports indicate that 22 lawmakers from Merkel’s coalition voted against the package, reflecting growing skepticism of the chancellor’s course in the euro crisis.Despite sharp criticism of Merkel’s handling of the euro crisis during the pre-vote parliamentary debate, the center-left Social Democrats and the Greens voted largely in favor of the aid package. The far-left Left Party voted against it.

The aid program is to have a duration of 18 months and is worth a maximum of €100 billion ($123 billion) though it is thought that Spain will only borrow some €62 billion. The emergency loan will be paid out in several tranches through the end of the year. Spain officially requested the bailout on June 25 after weeks of rising concern over the state of the country’s banks, struggling under billions in bad debts related to the collapse of the Spanish real estate market in 2009.

Spain had initially been reluctant to request bailout funds due to previous rules that the bailout fund could not provide aid directly to banks and that any such assistance package would include strict austerity requirements. But unrest in the financial markets ultimately made the move unavoidable, as interest rates on Spanish sovereign bonds shot upward due to investor fear that Madrid would be unable to shoulder the burden of bailing out its banks on its own.

‘A Difficult Path’

Furthermore, at a summit agreement in late June, European leaders agreed to change the rules governing the bailout fund, allowing the EFSF to loan money directly to Spain’s national bank bailout fund FROB.

Still, several conditions have been attached to the aid program, including stricter oversight of banks receiving support from FROB and a ceiling on the salaries of executives working for those banks. Furthermore, the European Commission will monitor Spain’s adoption of reforms requested by the EU, including an increase in the retirement age, tax reform and measures to liberalize the country’s labor market.

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble defended the aid package during parliamentary debate prior to the vote saying that difficulties in Spain’s financial sector could become “a problem for the financial stability of the euro zone.” He emphasized that Spain alone is responsible for the repayment of the loan package.Opposition leaders voiced vehement criticism of the government on Thursday, with Social Democratic floor leader Frank-Walter Steinmeier accusing Merkel of not having a clear plan and of not doing enough to explain to German voters what the ongoing euro crisis holds in store. “We have to say that this will be a difficult path, that it will take a long time and that it will include significant burdens for our own country,” he said. “You should have been explaining it every day since May 2010,” he said, addressing the chancellor, “but you don’t because you fear the collapse of your coalition.”

Thursday’s vote took place during parliament’s traditional summer recess, but members of parliament were called back to Berlin in a rare move. On June 29, Bundestag President Norbert Lammert of Merkel’s conservatives admonished parliamentarians heading out on their holidays: “Don’t swim too far out and make sure your carry-on baggage is within close reach.”

cgh — with wire reports

German Secret Service Protected Neo-Nazi Group With Help From Political Parties

Christoph Dreier
World Socialist Web Site

© Reuters
Heinz Fromm, head of Germany’s Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution

More facts are continually emerging demonstrating the links between the German domestic intelligence service (Office for the Protection of the Constitution – VS) and neo-Nazi terrorists. Yet under conditions where broad layers of the population fear the emergence of a new version of the Gestapo, the German Left Party is explicitly defending the secret service and calling for structural changes aimed at optimizing its activities.

Late last year media reports revealed that a neo-fascist organization called the National Socialist Underground (NSU) had been operating in Germany since 2000 and was responsible for at least nine racially motivated murders as well as the killing of a policewoman.

The investigation showed that the VS had been informed about the activities of the NSU from the start and indicated that the intelligence service was deliberately protecting NSU members from prosecution. The VS had installed undercover agents in the periphery of the organization, yet it ignored evidence linking NSU members to bomb-making operations and helped at least one NSU terrorist obtain a new passport.

Despite these revelations, no serious probe was carried out. Rather than launch a comprehensive investigation, the German parliament (Bundestag) decided to expand the powers of the agency. The VS is now entitled to access crucial files of the police and state intelligence forces – a linkup of the police and secret service that had been officially banned in Germany since World War II as a result of the crimes of Hitler’s Gestapo.

At the end of June it emerged that one day after the initial revelations about the NSU last November, a VS officer destroyed seven personnel files of undercover agents operating in the environment of the NSU. This willful destruction of evidence was covered up until a week ago.

Earlier this week, Heinz Fromm, a member of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), resigned from his post as director of the VS. A few days later the head of the VS in the state of Thuringia also resigned. These steps were aimed at silencing internal critics rather than throwing any light on what had gone on.

It remains unclear whether members of the NSU were on the payroll of the secret police. There are many indications, however, that the VS played a central and active role in building up the NSU. The latest facts also suggest that the collaboration with the neo-Nazis was not the initiative of just one or two agents, but was coordinated at the highest levels of the VS.

All attempts to uncover these relations, however, have been hampered not only by the VS, but also by all of the political parties represented in parliament. All of these parties have representatives in the parliamentary monitoring body PKGr, which is empowered to investigate every unit of German intelligence and gain access to any of their files. But none of the members of the PKGr have made public any substantive information.

Instead, all of the parties are defending the intelligence agency and downplaying what has taken place as mere “failures” and “mistakes”. They are not calling for a full investigation and the disbanding of the service, but rather for “structural reform”, in the words of the Green Party’s Claudia Roth, or “fundamental reform”, as proposed by the SPD’s Thomas Oppermann.

The aim of any such reform is to increase the powers of the intelligence service. The Christian Democratic interior minister for Lower Saxony, Uwe Schünemann, has already announced steps in this direction. It is necessary “that the [VS] be involved even more in concrete security and law enforcement”, he declared last Wednesday.

The most vehement defense of the secret service, however, has come from the Left Party faction in the Bundestag. Their representative in the PKGr, Wolfgang Neskovic, declared on German radio that Germany needed the intelligence agency. “I understand the criticism, it is justified”, he said, “but we can’t just abolish the fire brigade because it fails to extinguish a fire”.

Neskovic and the Left Party thereby line up behind the cross-party attempt to present the VS’ collaboration with the NSU as a regrettable mistake by an otherwise efficient and legitimate authority.

The reality is that from the start of its existence, the VS played the role of arsonist rather than fire fighter. It was built up after 1955 by Hubert Schrübbers, who had served the Nazi regime as a member of the SA storm troopers and as attorney general. According to Wikipedia, he filled a huge number of posts in the secret service with former members of the SS and its intelligence service, the SD.

Since the early 1990s there have been numerous reports of VS operatives, mostly undercover agents, playing a leading role in the neo-Nazi scene in Germany. They have included convicted criminals and their associates. It was revealed that one in seven functionaries of the extreme-right National Democratic Party (NPD) was on the payroll of the VS.

From its inception, this reactionary institution was directed exclusively against left-wing organizations and any independent movement of the working class. Following the introduction of the 1972 Radical Decree by SPD Chancellor Willy Brandt, the agents of the VS raked through the files of 1.4 million mostly young aspirants for public service in order to prevent those with links to left-wing organizations from obtaining jobs. The ban was justified with the claim that left-wingers were enemies of the Constitution, i.e., guilty of treason.

The same argument has now been taken up by Neskovic to silence opponents of the secret service. He justifies his rejection of calls for the disbandment of the intelligence agency by stating that infringement on the “duty to protect the Constitution [would itself] be a constitutional violation”. This choice of words is very important in Germany, where in the name of protecting the Constitution, the state is empowered not only to ban individuals from certain jobs, but to ban entire political organizations.

The stance adopted by the Left Party clearly illustrates its role as a party of bourgeois law and order. The Left Party was born from a merger of the union bureaucrat-dominated Labour and Social Justice – Electoral Alternative (WASG) and the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), the successor party to the East German Stalinist ruling party. As such, it embodies a long history of police-state measures to suppress the working class.

Emerging from the Stalinist party that created the notorious Stasi secret police, the PDS played a crucial role in suppressing independent strikes, factory occupations and demonstrations during the period of the capitalist reunification of Germany. The chairman of the Council of Elders of the party, Hans Modrow, has often boasted that the most important role of the party was “to maintain law and order” during those volatile months.

The fact that the Left Party has now so clearly returned to its roots in the VS affair and committed itself to the struggle against “enemies of the Constitution” is bound up with the growth of social inequality and the escalating assault on the working class. Throughout Europe workers are been driven into poverty while the banks receive hundreds of billions in public funds.

This will inevitably lead to social convulsions and an explosive growth of the class struggle. The ruling class in Germany, as throughout Europe, in the US and internationally, is preparing for this eventuality by building up the repressive powers of the state.

Basic democratic rights are being eroded under the auspices of bourgeois governments of all political stripes, and, where necessary, as in Greece and Italy, elected governments are being replaced by unelected technocrats, while far-right parties are groomed by the state to step in. The role of the intelligence service in Germany in cultivating and protecting fascist terrorists and killers provides a glimpse of how far the ruling elite is prepared to go.

The polarization of class forces compels every political tendency to display its true colors and reveal its class character. It has clearly exposed the right-wing bourgeois character of the Left Party.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 842 other followers